3 ms·
JATS is gaining adoption in publishing, but is difficult for scientists to actually _author_ in. This is one of the main reasons behind tools like MyST (https:/
by rowanc1 3y ago
JATS is gaining adoption in publishing, but is difficult for scientists to actually _author_ in. This is one of the main reasons behind tools like MyST (https://myst-tools.org https://myst-tools.org) and Quarto (https://quarto.org/ https://quarto.org/) - both are semantic authoring tools that allow authors to export to JATS but author in Markdown (or in JupyterNotebooks).
Having semantic authoring tools also means that you can easily change the template -- saving a ton of time for the author. For example, about 400 journal templates here:
https://myst-tools.org/docs/mystjs/creating-pdf-documents https://myst-tools.org/docs/mystjs/creating-pdf-documents