4 ms·
Of all of them isn't Google the only one that is actually incentivized to keep the data they get on you to themselves, because of their business model? It sound
by AnonCoward42 3y ago
Of all of them isn't Google the only one that is actually incentivized to keep the data they get on you to themselves, because of their business model? It sounds bad for Google when they sell their data to others, so they'd feed a competitor for personalized ads. I might be wrong tho.
It's obvious, but I want to make clear, that this doesn't make Google less scary or more trustworty. Avoiding Google is still advised imo.
edit: replace "private" with "to themselves"
- spogbiper 3y agoRight as I understand it at least. Google's business model has never been to sell your data, despite how persistent that idea seems to be. Your data is Google's most valuable resource and they should be extremely motivated to protect it.
- dwaite 3y agoGoogle's primary interest is in building a relationship with you so it understands the kinds of information you want, and can sell people on preferential order of getting information to you. They are primarily an information marketplace, and offer people free services so that they'll participate in that market. Their secondary interest is in things like Adsense and in products like Doubleclick, which are where you worry about tracking and them building a behavioral persona of what you do across the entire internet. However, Google doesn't need to even see this persona themselves - they just want to get the best ads in front of you to make marketing departments happy. Ideas like "privacy sandbox" are partially driven by this desire - give Google the value of gathering and correlating existing data and more, without the brand impact or risks of holding that data themselves. The thing they give up is the ability to do cluster analysis across people/demographics to understand where and why an ad is performing. Targeting of advertisements remains a manual process and not a machine learning driven one.