4 ms·
> My favorite part about this is how it basically forces services to accept this as a functional scenario. Maybe some services will accept it, but others will
by memco 3y ago
> My favorite part about this is how it basically forces services to accept this as a functional scenario.
Maybe some services will accept it, but others will not. When I tried to sign in to Microsoft Teams from Safari yesterday it presented a screen that said that Teams will only load on Safari if I disable tracking prevention for the Teams site. So unless users put additional pressures on services to offer support for Apple those services may just force users to accept tracking one way or another: either by disabling Safari's mitigations or using an alternative client that does not use such mitigations.
- blitz_skull 3y agoOh no, I can’t use a useless Microsoft product in Safari! Jesting aside, it’s a bad example. No one is changing their browser so they can login to their employer’s shitty surveillance, oops, I mean communication platform.
- jeroenhd 3y agoIn what world aren't they? Their employer's shitty web frameworks are why IE11 has been relevant for so long. Your choices are 1) download the native application (with much more access to your system) 2) follow the instructions 3) open Chrome because realistically you probably already have it anyway or 4) lose your job to prove a point.