4 ms·
Extensions not running is disappointing. I would prefer my adblocker run in the app as well.
by square_usual 3y ago
Extensions not running is disappointing. I would prefer my adblocker run in the app as well.
- freediver 3y agoYou can try Orion browser's [1] web apps which inherit the native adblocker from Orion and have more powerful options than Safari, while still running WebKit underneath. [2] [1] https://browser.kagi.com https://browser.kagi.com [2] https://blog.kagi.com/orion-new-features https://blog.kagi.com/orion-new-features
- square_usual 3y agoI am an active user of Orion! I'd like Safari-based apps to be better, if only so I can also use them as such on iPad and iPhone.
- Etheryte 3y agoWhile I understand where you're coming from, I think it makes a lot of sense continuity-wise. A regular user doesn't care nor know how these apps work internally, as far as they're concerned, it's just another app. You wouldn't expect changing the settings of one of your apps to change the way random other apps work (power user tools notwithstanding).
- c-hendricks 3y agoGiven I'm a developer who uses PWAs on every device, my opinion probably doesn't mean much compared to the general public. But this means I'll never use YouTube in Web App.app, and just sounds like it's going to be annoying using my password manager (though to be fair, Safari alone makes it a pain to use my password manager)