3 ms·
The post we're replying to said: > Because during COVID a lot of companies started saying that's their new philosophy and are reneging on it now that they feel
by bluefishinit 3y ago
The post we're replying to said:
> Because during COVID a lot of companies started saying that's their new philosophy and are reneging on it now that they feel they can, and a lot of us shuffled around during that time. People hired onto remote teams and are getting rug pulled now.
Twitter is one of those companies. Any company that didn't say "you can work remote temporarily", but now wants to force RTO is also going back on their social (and potentially legal) contract with their employees.
- dcow 3y agoI'm trying to clarify my understanding. Is it the case that Twitter has reneged on telling employees they can work fully remote? I have no disagreement with you that there are social and potentially legal problems with companies that have said that. I am just trying to understand if Twitter and more relevantly Google have done that.
- bluefishinit 3y agoYes, Twitter promised "work from home forever" and Musk unceremoniously reversed that. Same with Slack: https://mashable.com/article/slack-remote-work-permanent-coronavirus https://mashable.com/article/slack-remote-work-permanent-cor... I'm sure there are other but those are the two I know off the top of my head that promised work from home "forever" then went back on their word.
- dcow 3y agoThen if I were a Twitter employee I'd be pretty upset. In terms of Google and Amazon and Apple telling people to come back to the office, though, not sure there's the same grounds for outrage.
- PraetorianGourd 3y agoThey should have never used “permanent” or “forever”. New leaders come in, old leaders go out. Realities change. Should every subsequent CEO be bound by some promise of a prior CEO? Seems unsustainable.