3 ms·
Ruling was 8-1, so if politics are happening, they seem mostly bipartisan in this specific EPA case.
by paddw 3y ago
Ruling was 8-1, so if politics are happening, they seem mostly bipartisan in this specific EPA case.
- enragedcacti 3y agoIt was actually 9-0 in this particular case. All justices agreed that the Sacketts' wetland was not subject to the CWA. What is under contention (and was a 5-4 decision) is under what grounds and what test should be applied going forward: https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/05/supreme-court-curtails-clean-water-act/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/05/supreme-court-curtails-cl...