4 ms·
This is probably a stupid question regarding the equipment, but it seems to be a good addition for the user, even if additional hardware underneath is required
by chaxor 3y ago
This is probably a stupid question regarding the equipment, but it seems to be a good addition for the user, even if additional hardware underneath is required - why is CO not more common on these devices?
Additionally, where are all the ppbv CO detection capabilities? (most are ppm, likely to not be a scare to humans but always reading "0", but it makes determining sensitivity or any response at all pretty difficult)
- StrictDabbler 3y agoCO detectors are life-safety equipment. The regulatory burden for laboratory certification and approval is much higher for them. If you put an air-quality detector into your device and it's reading 30% lower than reality it's no big deal. If you put a CO detector into your device and it's reading 30% lower than reality you may face massive liabilities. It isn't a "hey, why not" feature.