Do I really need to go through and trace the entire history of psychology and every false start and course correction in order to prove that they do it too? D

Do I really need to go through and trace the entire history of psychology and every false start and course correction in order to prove that they do it too? Do you see the difference in the burden of proof. You are starting from the position of 'Psychology' is all false, now proof everything by citing everything over again. But, to do so, I would need to cite something in Psychology, and you can just deny it again. What evidence can be cited if all evidence is dismissed. You will probably say something along the lines of 'what can be verified or repeated'. Ok, just go look. Why do I need to re-cite an entire discipline, just go read it.