4 ms·
This is not a Lisp, and never claimed to be one. This kind of gatekeeping from ANSI Common Lisp purists is tiring. Who cares about convention when one just wan
by sph 3y ago
This is not a Lisp, and never claimed to be one.
This kind of gatekeeping from ANSI Common Lisp purists is tiring. Who cares about convention when one just wants to build their own language, use S-exprs and car/cdr for the sake of it.
- maleldil 3y ago> Who cares Potential users care. It's off-putting to use something familiar but different in strange ways. Using head/tail versus car/cdr would be a deviation I could understand. This = mess isn't.
- chlorion 3y agoIt's not like common lisps practices are that great anyways. It being an old lisp convention, to me, is actually a reason to not follow it. I want to see a modern take on sexpr based languages instead of being stuck in the past forever.