3 ms·
Why is it not a blatant antitrust violation for a company that makes a browser to add code to their other products that goes out of its way to not work when it
by josephcsible 3y ago
Why is it not a blatant antitrust violation for a company that makes a browser to add code to their other products that goes out of its way to not work when it detects competitors' browsers?
- _fat_santa 3y agoNot a lawyer but I think it's because that would be considered "compelled speech". If you think of a website as someones free speech, then forcing someone to make their site compatible with a certain browser would be "compelled speech".
- josephcsible 3y agoIt seems like a gigantic stretch to call that "speech".
- MrStonedOne 3y ago[dead]
- hospitalJail 3y agoWait until you learn about accessibility laws.