Surely what matters more than detecting generated content is verifying that the information is true and consistent and limiting the quantity and length of submi

Surely what matters more than detecting generated content is verifying that the information is true and consistent and limiting the quantity and length of submissions per verified user of a system. That takes care of the quality of the submission. The other part is determining attribution. Why not just ask the human submitter to defend their work in a controlled environment? If they can, it's their paper now. I don't see a difference between unassisted people turning in crap vs assisted people still turning in crap.