With all these claims of ChatGPT content detection, it assumes that the person using ChatGPT is just taking the raw output and not doing any editing or verifica

With all these claims of ChatGPT content detection, it assumes that the person using ChatGPT is just taking the raw output and not doing any editing or verification. We are treading onto Ship of Theseus grounds here, but how much has to change before it's not important? For example: > "One of the biggest problems is that it assembles text from many sources and there isn't any kind of accuracy check – it's kind of like the game Two Truths and a Lie." That's not a ChatGPT problem. It's an accuracy problem. If the output is edited to fix the accuracy, then it's no longer an issue. Yes, blindly using output can be an issue, the issue is accuracy, not the method used to generate it. If ChatGTP output was 100% accurate, what would be the next problem?