> With the story so oddly slanted it makes me wonder who bought this placement. I had the same thought, and guessed I.P.G (or their allies in the publishing in

> With the story so oddly slanted it makes me wonder who bought this placement. I had the same thought, and guessed I.P.G (or their allies in the publishing industry). This is not a great feat of analysis, though: there are two parties in the dispute, and _Amazon_ certainly didn't buy this coverage. One hopes not, anyway, for their sake.