2 ms·
That kind of assumes there's an endless stream of quality moderators willing to work for free, just waiting for their turn.
by The_Colonel 3y ago
That kind of assumes there's an endless stream of quality moderators willing to work for free, just waiting for their turn.
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoNo, it correctly assumes there's an endless stream of people wanting to be moderators so they can wield the power that comes with that. Whether that be by being a quality mod or by abusing it to silence people they disagree with is irrelevant.
- The_Colonel 3y agoIt's not irrelevant. "Moderator" who uses their privileges only for abuse is not actually fulfilling the role of a moderator. Quality goes down the drain as a result.
- kotaKat 3y ago> "quality moderators" Reddit admins will just install the generic supermoderators that already "moderate" 300 default subs and call it a day. IPO line goes up, baby!