2 ms·
> Gcp is profitable, azure is not Asserting that GCP is profitable while Azure is not doesn't necessarily determine their respective successes. A company might
by varispeed 3y ago
> Gcp is profitable, azure is not
Asserting that GCP is profitable while Azure is not doesn't necessarily determine their respective successes. A company might reinvest all its revenue back into growth and innovation, hence posting zero profit - this doesn't signify poor performance. Conversely, a company reporting a profit could potentially be stagnating, inflating profits to appease shareholders potentially seeking to exit. Profitability alone isn't a comprehensive measure of a company's health or potential.
> Google invented LLMs
Poor argument. E.g. Xerox invented GUI, where are they now?
- bagacrap 3y agoReinvesting profits doesn't mean you didn't have profits. Msft, aapl, goog, meta all reinvest profits in new ventures. Only Amazon can't manage to make a buck and tries to pass it off as reinvestment. Wrt azure vs gcp, I just don't think you can say azure is "killing it" when it's a loss leader for the company. Gcp has proven it can operate profitably, we don't know if azure ever will. Right now its business model approximates Uber.