Everyone is biased. Some of other popular sources that people like to cite are biased through their financing of which the fossil fuel industry and other specia

Everyone is biased. Some of other popular sources that people like to cite are biased through their financing of which the fossil fuel industry and other special interest groups (e.g. the automotive industry) are providing a lot of. I think with electrek.co, their bias is pretty obvious and they are pretty open about where they stand. But I must say that I find them mostly very informative and factual. There's actually very little need for them to spin optimistic stories when the day to day news is basically very positive already. Just a constant stream of records being broken on investment, clean energy production, new breakthroughs, new products getting to market. There's no need for them to invent or spin any of that. You find the lies and deceit more on the other side where people try to spin myths, twist facts, etc. in order to convince people to keep on buying their oil, ice cars, dirty energy, and all the other stuff that they are peddling. Some of that stuff is blatantly obvious; desperate even. The IEA for example is indeed notable for having made a lot of projections over time that were more than a little wrong. And probably intentionally so.