4 ms·
Monopoly is not a necessary condition for antitrust case.
by nolok 3y ago
Monopoly is not a necessary condition for antitrust case.
- orra 3y agoJust as well! Oligopolies are almost as bad as monopolies, for rent seeking and stifling competition. I don't know about US law, but EU competition law is concerned about “significant market power” and not (just) monopolies.
- inefficient 3y agoWhen talking about modeling oligopolies and monopolies, often oligopolies have worse results.
- plagiarist 3y agoWe need more antitrust on everything. Things are not working if consumers have no choices in practice. "Support Nestle or just never purchase any snack or drink," isn't a real choice.
- veave 3y agoIt also isn't a reality, and if it was, it would be a monopoly, and it would be dismantled.