>you're incorrect - you cannot "empirically prove creativity" Do humans even have creativity at this point or do you require a formal proof even for that? Ahah

>you're incorrect - you cannot "empirically prove creativity" Do humans even have creativity at this point or do you require a formal proof even for that? Ahah >As a professional artist Now I understand where the friction against accepting that even machines show signs of creativity comes from, I imagine you're an illustrator, so the feeling of becoming obsolete is the bias against machines.