4 ms·
Excellent point – I should probably have said mainstream fiction or general/non niche publishing house or something similar. Tech, while not a small market is s
by incongruity 15y ago
Excellent point – I should probably have said mainstream fiction or general/non niche publishing house or something similar. Tech, while not a small market is specialized enough to not threaten entrenched publishers – unless O'Reilly wants to branch out into fiction, etc.
Also, the simple idea of putting your name and address on each page is pretty good low-tech copy deterrence, IMHO. I didn't know about that – thanks for the insight.
Though
- a_a_r_o_n 15y agoYeah, I think embarrassment is about the right level for DRM.
- incongruity 15y agoEmbarrassment, indeed =) Relatedly, it's about simply making people choose one of three options (at the moment): 1) Don't copy it 2)Be okay with everyone knowing your name – i.e.: take a stand and flaunt your disagreement with copyright law or 3) Do a lot of manual work to scrub your name off (even harder if they're PW locked). Regardless, I like it because it's simple and it embraces the new realities (and abilities) of digital distribution. They could never do that with mass-market books 10 years ago, but now, it's trivial to do with on demand pdfs.