3 ms·
Yeah I think my point flew over your head, which is fine. And you're incorrect - you cannot "empirically prove creativity". As a professional artist I don't th
by wilimitis 3y ago
Yeah I think my point flew over your head, which is fine.
And you're incorrect - you cannot "empirically prove creativity". As a professional artist I don't think you quite understand that the type of creativity we are interested in is not just "permutation", there is clearly a human component.
I'm trying to show you that you are falling into the reverse of the AI effect by assuming that permutation is creativity.
- satvikpendem 3y agoIt doesn't seem like you can even define creativity in the first place for any of us to even attempt to answer your supposed point that flew over everyone's heads.
- wilimitis 3y agoI have defined it in your other comment, relax dude. No need to jump threads because you're emotional.
- GaggiX 3y ago>you're incorrect - you cannot "empirically prove creativity" Do humans even have creativity at this point or do you require a formal proof even for that? Ahah >As a professional artist Now I understand where the friction against accepting that even machines show signs of creativity comes from, I imagine you're an illustrator, so the feeling of becoming obsolete is the bias against machines.