That’s an important distinction, but is lost on 99% of the population. Try to voice any skepticism about climate change policy and most people will call you a

That’s an important distinction, but is lost on 99% of the population. Try to voice any skepticism about climate change policy and most people will call you a climate denier. Same with vaccines; express a skepticism of efficacy and suddenly you are an anti-science anti-Vaxer. The irony is that skepticism and asking annoying questions is essential to science. Ignoring ‘anti-scientific’ arguments is inherently anti-science.