Assuming a total lack of evidence on either side, I think your assertion is the counter-intuitive one and therefore has the greater burden of proof. Why would G

Assuming a total lack of evidence on either side, I think your assertion is the counter-intuitive one and therefore has the greater burden of proof. Why would Go be any different than Chess? A rising tide floats all ships – if the best in the world becomes better, others can look at the best and learn from it. What difference does it make if the best player is an AI or a human? The better moves and strategies are still better moves and strategies.