3 ms·
>Is going outside really that much worse than hanging within a few feet of a campfire for hours? It's more like you're surrounded by campfires except there are
by DiscourseFan 3y ago
>Is going outside really that much worse than hanging within a few feet of a campfire for hours?
It's more like you're surrounded by campfires except there are no fires, only smoke, and no way of turning away or escaping from it.
- rcme 3y agoOk sure, but that’s not really answering the question of whether or not acute exposure to campfires is worse than acute exposure to wildfire smoke.
- crazygringo 3y agoI've never found myself coughing next to campfires or BBQ's. Today (NYC) I went outside briefly and started coughing within a couple of minutes, and then my eyes started watering. It's nothing like being by a campfire. It's way worse. Campfire smoke goes straight up, or if it's windy nobody stands with the smoke blowing directly in their face for minutes/hours.
- ssnistfajen 3y agoAcute exposure is generally a concern for individuals with respiratory conditions e.g. asthma.
- brianpan 3y agoWhat are you asking though? Are you asking how a blast of heavy smoke compares to a constant cover of fine smoke? A lot all at once or a little over a long period of time are both bad. With a campfire, you can always scoot your chair back if you are getting too much smoke, but you are probably getting much more smoke all at once. With a wildfire, you can't escape it and normal activities like going for a jog or walking to your office become a problem.