4 ms·
"In doing that they usually jump to the most uncharitable, horrible reasons they can imagine for why we might have done so." So you do understand why one would
by jix 3y ago
"In doing that they usually jump to the most uncharitable, horrible reasons they can imagine for why we might have done so."
So you do understand why one wouldn't want to deal with a significant part of the user base here given that they behave in such ways, and thus why one might want to avoid any traffic coming from here, but feel that it's not your job to deal with those users, because then their behavior would affect you? I really hope you'll reflect on that...
- rascul 3y agoI didn't see any evidence for the claims made.
- dang 3y agoI haven't expressed myself clearly enough if that's a possible response to what I tried to say there. Unfortunately I'm at a workshop today and not free to take the hours I normally would to go over the explanation until it's clearly understandable. I only have a few minutes of break time. Perhaps it would have been better not to try in the first place, under such circumstnaces; but I'm not going to delete my GP comment now.
- bigbillheck 3y agoI've read it a couple times and it's hard for me to disagree with them. It sounds an awful lot like you're saying 'if we ban the domain, people will yell at me and get mad,' with the implication of 'and I would rather they yell and get mad at someone else.'