4 ms·
That line just bugs me on so many levels. Why can't they prosecute those cases without having the data on someone's laptop? What can someone have on a laptop th
by superppl 15y ago
That line just bugs me on so many levels. Why can't they prosecute those cases without having the data on someone's laptop?
What can someone have on a laptop that can be so important that without it it becomes impossible to convince a jury?
Honestly, I think if the prosecution is unable to move forward without that data, then they had no hope in the first place.
- whyenot 15y agoWouldn't an obvious case be possession of child pornography?
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ceol 15y agoI disagree. In cases of fraud, logs, emails, and spreadsheets could all be used to guarantee a case— especially if it's the online variety. From my understanding, you're basically asking for the prosecution to prosecute a murder case but not allow them to use the murder weapon— with the person's prints on it— as evidence.