That wasn't why they were fired, the way they states facts was flame-baiting, emotional and personal (as in against specific people, personally): https://www.la

That wasn't why they were fired, the way they states facts was flame-baiting, emotional and personal (as in against specific people, personally): https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/tv/story/2023-04-25/don-lemon-cnn-fired-nikki-haley-vivek-ramaswamy-kaitlan-collins-poppy-harlow https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/tv/story/2023-04-... It's not politics so much as tone that lacks semblance of neutrality. "It's not what you said but how you said it" , there are many ways to state a simple fact and journalists are trained to do so in a way that lets viewers/readers trust in them. They have to sound objective and their conclusions must be (and sound as if they are) based on facts and rational thinking as opposed to emotional reactions anyone one of us could have. Their emotional presentations help them with viewers that are only looking to have their biases confirmed but alienate viewers looking for facts and truth.