4 ms·

Meanwhile care of ChatGPT: To find the sum of the digits of a number, you add together all the individual digits. In the case of the number 15683615, the sum o

Meanwhile care of ChatGPT: To find the sum of the digits of a number, you add together all the individual digits. In the case of the number 15683615, the sum of its digits would be: 1 + 5 + 6 + 8 + 3 + 6 + 1 + 5 = 35 Therefore, the sum of the digits of 15683615 is 35. ==== Good job ChatGPT. This sort of “near miss” for Bard has been my experience the entire time I’ve compared Bard and ChatGPT. In the most hilarious example, I asked both to reword an email to someone named “Helena” to explain how I’ve been busy and did not return her email. I included her prompt for context, including her asking if I was on vacation. ChatGPT did a good job of adjusting my wording to be better understood by a non native English speaker and used her prompt appropriately. Bard spun a story about how I was vacationing with my non-existent children in Helena Montana. Bard just isn’t there yet.

Miraste 3y ago
It's frankly amazing how bad it is. On benchmarks and human comparisons, ChatGPT obliterates the small but growing open LLM community--but Bard is right in there with the open models. It's insane to me that Google, with the people who basically invented transformers and LLMs and basically unlimited TPUs, can't do better than a few hobbyists with like three A100s between them.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- tehsauce 3y ago
  No one has trained a LLM of the open source level quality with just 3 gpus. Fine tuning sure, but pretraining the even the smaller models takes more than that.
- whimsicalism 3y ago
  What it really shows is how far ahead Meta got in front of Google.
- cubefox 3y ago
  Their big new model will be Gemini ("twins") apparently a DeepMind / Google Brain joint project already before they merged.
cubefox 3y ago
Note that ChatGPT is using CoT (reasoning process before answer) while Bard isn't.
alphabetting 3y ago
To be fair, ChatGPT's answer is wrong when given the Bard example. To find the prime factors of 15,683,615, we can use a process called prime factorization. We divide the number by prime numbers until it can no longer be divided evenly. Here's the step-by-step process: We start by dividing 15,683,615 by the smallest prime number, which is 2. However, 15,683,615 is an odd number and not divisible by 2. Next, we try the next prime number, 3. If we divide 15,683,615 by 3, we get 5,227,871. Again, this is an odd number. We continue with the next prime number, 5. Dividing 15,683,615 by 5 gives us 3,136,723. Still an odd number. Moving on to the next prime number, 7. Dividing 15,683,615 by 7 yields 2,240,516. Again, this is an odd number. We try the next prime number, 11. Dividing 15,683,615 by 11 gives us 1,425,783. Still an odd number. Next, we try the prime number 13. Dividing 15,683,615 by 13 yields 1,205,659. This is an odd number. Continuing with the next prime number, 17. Dividing 15,683,615 by 17 gives us 920,755. Still an odd number. We try the prime number 19. Dividing 15,683,615 by 19 yields 823,035. This is an odd number. The next prime number is 23. Dividing 15,683,615 by 23 gives us 680,563. Still an odd number. Finally, we try the prime number 29. Dividing 15,683,615 by 29 yields 539,475, which is divisible by 5. Therefore, the prime factors of 15,683,615 are 3, 5, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, and 29.

Miraste 3y ago

It's frankly amazing how bad it is. On benchmarks and human comparisons, ChatGPT obliterates the small but growing open LLM community--but Bard is right in there with the open models. It's insane to me that Google, with the people who basically invented transformers and LLMs and basically unlimited TPUs, can't do better than a few hobbyists with like three A100s between them.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
tehsauce 3y ago
No one has trained a LLM of the open source level quality with just 3 gpus. Fine tuning sure, but pretraining the even the smaller models takes more than that.
whimsicalism 3y ago
What it really shows is how far ahead Meta got in front of Google.
cubefox 3y ago
Their big new model will be Gemini ("twins") apparently a DeepMind / Google Brain joint project already before they merged.

cubefox 3y ago

Note that ChatGPT is using CoT (reasoning process before answer) while Bard isn't.

alphabetting 3y ago

To be fair, ChatGPT's answer is wrong when given the Bard example. To find the prime factors of 15,683,615, we can use a process called prime factorization. We divide the number by prime numbers until it can no longer be divided evenly. Here's the step-by-step process: We start by dividing 15,683,615 by the smallest prime number, which is 2. However, 15,683,615 is an odd number and not divisible by 2. Next, we try the next prime number, 3. If we divide 15,683,615 by 3, we get 5,227,871. Again, this is an odd number. We continue with the next prime number, 5. Dividing 15,683,615 by 5 gives us 3,136,723. Still an odd number. Moving on to the next prime number, 7. Dividing 15,683,615 by 7 yields 2,240,516. Again, this is an odd number. We try the next prime number, 11. Dividing 15,683,615 by 11 gives us 1,425,783. Still an odd number. Next, we try the prime number 13. Dividing 15,683,615 by 13 yields 1,205,659. This is an odd number. Continuing with the next prime number, 17. Dividing 15,683,615 by 17 gives us 920,755. Still an odd number. We try the prime number 19. Dividing 15,683,615 by 19 yields 823,035. This is an odd number. The next prime number is 23. Dividing 15,683,615 by 23 gives us 680,563. Still an odd number. Finally, we try the prime number 29. Dividing 15,683,615 by 29 yields 539,475, which is divisible by 5. Therefore, the prime factors of 15,683,615 are 3, 5, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, and 29.