2 ms·
There's absolutely no way this is true. In a time where most of your children die of disease, you aren't going to just kill your healthy children for the comedy
by MagicMoonlight 3y ago
There's absolutely no way this is true. In a time where most of your children die of disease, you aren't going to just kill your healthy children for the comedy value. People do a lot of fucked up shit but nobody kills their own children. Other people's children sure. Giving children to the temple so that they'll become exhaulted priests sure. But they would never beat their own children to death because someone said it's a fun idea.
This is one of those moments like when historians say the royal poo wiper is the most prestigious role in court. If historians found modern texts they would think "ass kissing" is the highest ranking role in the country and that people who get selected to that role have all the power and influence.
- Detrytus 3y ago> In a time where most of your children die of disease, you aren't going to just kill your healthy children for the comedy value. On the other hand, in a time when there is no contraception available you kind of expect to have up to a dozen children over your lifetime. Sacrificing one of them seems easier that if they were the only child.