3 ms·

chatGPT-4 Result: Sure, you can use the following Python program to output the string you provided: ```python print("00000000010001000011001000010100110001110

by vuln 3y ago

chatGPT-4 Result: Sure, you can use the following Python program to output the string you provided: ```python print("0000000001000100001100100001010011000111010000100101010010110110001101011100111110000100011001010011101001010110110101111100011001110101101111100111011111011111") ``` This is the simplest and most direct method to output the string. If you have a more complex task in mind, like generating this string according to a certain pattern, please provide more details.

jabowery 3y ago
The "more complex task in mind" was, of course, to generate the "shortest" program. GPT-4, by asking for a "certain pattern" is attempting to have you do the intellectual heavy lifting for it -- although in this case the intellectual lifting is quite light.
- blowski 3y ago
  I really don't understand your requirements.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
arp242 3y ago
This is shorter for starters: print(bin(0x443214c74254b635cf84653a56d7c675be77df)[2:]) May be possible to shave off a few bytes with f'..' strings, or see if there are any repeating patterns, I'm not the sort who enjoys "code golfing", but "use base-16 to represent a base-2 number more compactly" seems fairly obvious to me.
- jabowery 3y ago
  Wrong output. What you call "code golf" is the essence of the natural sciences: Inducing natural laws from the data generated by those natural laws. In this case, the universe to be modeled was generated by: print(‘’.join([f’{xint:0{5}b}’ for xint in range(32)]))
  - arp242 3y ago
    Oh right, you need the leading zeroes won't get printed; need a formatting string with a specific width for that. I don't do much Python so I don't recall the exact syntax off-hand, but the point was: there is an obvious way to compact the number that can be done without any analysis of the number itself (or even looking at it, for that matter). While print(literal) is "cheating" if you ask for "create a program that generates ...", it is a very obvious thing to do if you want to go down that route.

by vuln 3y ago

jabowery 3y ago

The "more complex task in mind" was, of course, to generate the "shortest" program. GPT-4, by asking for a "certain pattern" is attempting to have you do the intellectual heavy lifting for it -- although in this case the intellectual lifting is quite light.

blowski 3y ago
I really don't understand your requirements.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

arp242 3y ago

This is shorter for starters: print(bin(0x443214c74254b635cf84653a56d7c675be77df)[2:]) May be possible to shave off a few bytes with f'..' strings, or see if there are any repeating patterns, I'm not the sort who enjoys "code golfing", but "use base-16 to represent a base-2 number more compactly" seems fairly obvious to me.

jabowery 3y ago
Wrong output. What you call "code golf" is the essence of the natural sciences: Inducing natural laws from the data generated by those natural laws. In this case, the universe to be modeled was generated by: print(‘’.join([f’{xint:0{5}b}’ for xint in range(32)]))
- arp242 3y ago
  Oh right, you need the leading zeroes won't get printed; need a formatting string with a specific width for that. I don't do much Python so I don't recall the exact syntax off-hand, but the point was: there is an obvious way to compact the number that can be done without any analysis of the number itself (or even looking at it, for that matter). While print(literal) is "cheating" if you ask for "create a program that generates ...", it is a very obvious thing to do if you want to go down that route.