> I don't know why you are looking at 1440p (2560 x 1440) as the m1 here is running at 1440x900. Ah, you are right, I messed up with the resolution. > The m1

> I don't know why you are looking at 1440p (2560 x 1440) as the m1 here is running at 1440x900. Ah, you are right, I messed up with the resolution. > The m1 gpu is broadly equivalent to a gtx 1650 in a host of benchmarks. Which ones? > This is getting less than half the fps a gtx 1650 does at these settings, and I am being charitable. ... without having to emulate both CPU architecture and graphics layer. I mean, this is not really a debate. DXVK is not comparable, Wine does not do the same either. We are talking about translating both CPU instructions and graphic API calls in real time, good enough that a triple A game runs without any modification on a laptop with 16GB of shared memory.