3 ms·
These stacks of gpus are not people. Repeat with me. These stacks of gpus are not people.
by barbariangrunge 3y ago
These stacks of gpus are not people. Repeat with me. These stacks of gpus are not people.
- ben_w 3y agoThat's a cute line to stochastically parrot, not something which anyone yet knows how to even test the truthfulness or falsity of.
- bheadmaster 3y agoStrawman argument - nobody is claiming that stacks of GPUs are people.
- hedora 3y agoWell, corporations are people, so I’m sure sufficiently large stacks of GPUs are also legally (parts of) people too. Though I’m not sure what place the US Supreme Court’s opinions have in rational discourse at this point.
- pdntspa 3y agoAnd art cannot be controlled once it is released to the public. If you don't want people to see it, if you're too cowardly to accept the all the consequences that come with it, then don't release your art. It's really that simple. It doesn't matter if it's my eyes and brain, the computer working for me, or the eye of Sauron for that matter. Once the cat is out of the bag, any control you think you have over it is an illusion, propped up by laws that are easy to evade.