3 ms·
> Yeah, uploading six versions of every image doesn't intersect with my definition of not caring. You're not doing this manually though, and images encoded for
by CharlesW 3y ago
> Yeah, uploading six versions of every image doesn't intersect with my definition of not caring.
You're not doing this manually though, and images encoded for distribution are small. The path to JPEG XL eventually mattering is by JPEG XL alternates being automatically created from a higher-quality source image by your CMS, or at build time, or via services like CloudFlare Images, etc.
Even once Safari 17 (and all iOS browsers via WebKit) makes JPEG XL worth making an alternate for, most sites are realistically 5+ years away from not having to have a JPEG fallback. And if you're doing that, you might as well support the far-more-popular WebP as well.
- ksec 3y ago>you might as well support the far-more-popular WebP as well. May be far more compatible. I am not sure if WebP is actually popular.