3 ms·
> It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. Other sources say this is about inertial navigation, not based on charts. "Accelerometers measure how a
by sampo 3y ago
> It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing.
Other sources say this is about inertial navigation, not based on charts.
"Accelerometers measure how an object’s velocity changes over time. With this, and the starting point of the object, the new position can be calculated."
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/188973/quantum-compass-could-allow-navigation-without/ https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/188973/quantum-compass-could...
- George83728 3y agoWhat's the difference between measuring accelerations and measuring gravity? I think with any INS system, if you want to be very accurate you need charts of gravitational anomalies. So these seem like one and the same to me.
- rcxdude 3y agoThere isn't any inherent difference (indeed, you can do some coarse gravity surveys by basically watching the drift of an IMU relative to GPS), but there's a pretty big difference in terms of the parameters of your sensor. Most gravimeters don't make for good accelerometers and vice-versa. One of the biggest reasons being dynamic range: most gravimeters are only able to sense a very small range around 1g, which means they quickly saturate when there's any significant motion. I don't know if that's something which these quantum sensors can work around, however. (Also, you need a gyro good enough to go along with those accelerometers, which may still be a challenge)