4 ms·
There's a very-limited-scale open-source dataset available that would allow some degree of independent assessment: https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/22/scale-ai-r
by photochemsyn 3y ago
There's a very-limited-scale open-source dataset available that would allow some degree of independent assessment:
https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/22/scale-ai-releases-free-lidar-dataset-to-power-self-driving-car-development/ https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/22/scale-ai-releases-free-lid...
I imagine 99% of the collected data is proprietary and hidden from public view, so it becomes a question of taking corporate claims at face value, which has never been that great of an idea.
Case in point: it's hard to imagine that electric semis hauling goods hundreds of miles can do so safely without human operators involved at some stages on the route. Hence, even with decent autonomous systems having a (paid!) driver in the truck at all times is the rationale thing to do - and yes, that means labor costs in that sector won't be changed much by self-driving AI technology. It will likely increase safety, as the trucks can drive themselves autonomously on the open freeway more safely than a (tired) human driver can.
- intrasight 3y agoThe human operators most certainly won't be inside the semi. They will be sitting in a control room wearing an Apple Vision.
- astrange 3y agoWaymo remote operators don't drive the cars remotely, they plot manual courses and the cars follow them. Trucks have worse failure modes and are less likely to be able to recover even with that much prompting.
- intrasight 3y agoI am referring to the future when this is real
- astrange 3y agoI'm not sure it can ever be real because of lightspeed delays, and because the trucks might get stuck in ways its sensors can't see. (Since if they could see it, they could fix it.)
- intrasight 3y agoLightspeed won't be a factor. But for sure vehicles will get stuck. Fallback is the current regime - vehicle just stops and waits.