3 ms·
No, but I bet his quants backtest trading strategies. His argument for dismissing LLMs is nonsensical, just because something uses information from the past doe
by maxilevi 3y ago
No, but I bet his quants backtest trading strategies. His argument for dismissing LLMs is nonsensical, just because something uses information from the past doesn't mean its useless. In fact, every tool we have can match that criticism in one way or another
- JimtheCoder 3y agoYes, but backtesting does not need an LLM...backtesting has been a thing for many, many years. Also, if you listen to any of his other speeches, or read the article, he does mention that they are using LLMs to port code from one language to another...so, he is not entirely dismissing LLMs.