4 ms·
> Also, it's pretty clear that cities are too large for our social apparatus Citation needed? Humans have been living in cities for thousands of years.
by dointheatl 3y ago
> Also, it's pretty clear that cities are too large for our social apparatus
Citation needed? Humans have been living in cities for thousands of years.
- portpecos 3y agoAt an extraordinary cost to human health. Sewage problems spread disease. Malnourishment due to only eating bread. The average height of a Paleolithic man far exceeded the height of a Neolithic man.
- astrange 3y agoThis is Berkson's paradox - Neolithic men may have been less healthy, but that could be because the hunter-gatherers died or stopped having children when they ran out of food rather than living off bread.
- Aerbil313 3y agoCities of the past are nothing like those of today. Nor the lifestyle of them.
- lolinder 3y agoTaking the Roman Empire as an example: Rome was by far the largest city in the empire at a total of ~1 million people. The others were estimated to have 500 thousand or fewer, with only 25-30% of the population living in a city at all. Modern cities are enormous by comparison and our urbanization rate is completely flipped. 80% of people in the US live in a city, and we have 50 metro areas with a higher population than Rome had during the empire. Our largest metro area is New York/Newark/Jersey City at 20 million people, 20x that of imperial Rome. And remember that Rome itself was an anomaly in its day, and the Roman Empire in general was an anomaly in European history.