No, it would suggest that every paper has something in it that can be considered a fatal flaw by a person biased against it. Peer review is precisely supposed t

No, it would suggest that every paper has something in it that can be considered a fatal flaw by a person biased against it. Peer review is precisely supposed to admit this and minimize flaws in conclusions given inevitable flaws in methodology. Sort of a research paper equivalent of: "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." by Cardinal Richelieu