3 ms·
They did, although the graph cuts off just before the 3090 takes the lead and goes beyond. https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2022/03/M1-vs-3090.jpg https://cdn.vide
by whywhywhywhy 3y ago
They did, although the graph cuts off just before the 3090 takes the lead and goes beyond.
https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2022/03/M1-vs-3090.jpg https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2022/03/M1-vs-3090.jpg
Frustrating they're being this misleading when M1 is outstanding for it's own reasons, but 3090 eats it alive in the workflows it excels in too.
Perfect machine would be both those chips in the same box tbh.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mrguyorama 3y agoThey've been straight up lying about the M series chips performance from day one. They will show insane graphs of the M chips beating top end desktop parts with an asterisk that explains the very specific BS benchmark they used that clearly favors their chip but won't generalize and then public benchmarks never even come close. People still parrot it.
- disnaturally 3y agoI do not understand. The picture you link clearly does not cut off that way: if it were the case, the curves would be about to cross at the cut, or maybe I am missing something?