> There is no reason to ever use btrfs, IMO. > ... > Due to the massive data loss issues with btrfs, for example, Redhat completely removed btrfs support in 8

> There is no reason to ever use btrfs, IMO. > ... > Due to the massive data loss issues with btrfs, for example, Redhat completely removed btrfs support in 8 entirely, after the preview feature in 7 bombed. They default to, and highly recommend, XFS (as do I, its a good file system). Synology strongly recommends btrfs in its NAS systems and promotes that over ext4, which is also supported by Synology. [1] On the consumer side, I guess this would probably be larger than ZFS/XFS usage. [1]: https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/Btrfs https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/Btrfs