I thought the story was a bit overblown when it was first posted, and still do, but I don't see how you can call out another article as "nonsense" without refut

I thought the story was a bit overblown when it was first posted, and still do, but I don't see how you can call out another article as "nonsense" without refuting a single factual claim it made. "The Tesla Bricking Story? It's Overblown"... okay, yeah... but "Nonsense"? Prove it.