3 ms·
> you never consented to share it with In what way would consent be required? If someone sits in a public park and paints a nude picture with my face on it, d
by prepend 3y ago
> you never consented to share it with
In what way would consent be required?
If someone sits in a public park and paints a nude picture with my face on it, do I need to consent? I probably don’t even know it exists. I expect the harm would be greater if a bunch of perverts/artistic souls sought me out and asked consent for things that don’t require my consent.
Or should we require consent before someone dreams of us? Or imagines us?
I’m curious how frequently this happens, but I expect quite a bit. In high school locker rooms, I remember kids talking about pretty much every other student nude, etc etc. Should that require consent? What’s the line? When someone draws it? Or generates it? Or when they distribute it?
I think the legal limit now is based on defamation so the harm is when the fake is presented as real.
- ethanbond 3y agoI am not proposing that anyone "need" consent for any of this. I'm saying that engaging in it without consent just makes you an asshole, as is true with several of the examples you just provided. Yep, painting a pornographic nude of someone you saw in the park is creepy, weird, disrespectful, and yes you should be called a weird, disrespectful creep for doing it. Should you go to jail? No. Is there a (blurry, hard to define) line between disrespectful nude depictions and respectful ones? Yep. This service, for example, is clearly geared toward equipping weird, disrespectful creeps.
- prepend 3y ago[dead]