4 ms·
It’s funny as I remember as a kid people would argue against the sports illustrated swimsuit edition because it let people imagine the women without closed and
by prepend 3y ago
It’s funny as I remember as a kid people would argue against the sports illustrated swimsuit edition because it let people imagine the women without closed and that’s just wrong.
And I wondered if places that require women to wear coverings had the same logic (ie,”if people see too much ankle they can imagine a bare leg”).
My school once got penalized in a cheerleading competition because the uniforms only went over the knees instead of the other teams where it went to their ankles. What was the point as both wore bloomers underneath.
However, I think it’s the idea of stopping people from thinking lascivious thoughts. I think it’s a losing battle as people have great imagination.
I would have a problem if these deepnude sites had X-ray vision or something, but just predicting what someone looks like nude is hard to stop. Can you even make it illegal to imagine someone nude? I think we’ll find out soon in the next 20 years as people start adding “nude mode” to Apple Vision and Teams where all the attractive people appear nude.