2 ms·
Science? That would be my first guess unless there's reason to suspect otherwise. The underlying paper was published in an academic journal with at least some h
by Xylakant 3y ago
Science? That would be my first guess unless there's reason to suspect otherwise. The underlying paper was published in an academic journal with at least some history, so that speaks for the authors intend.
The fact that there's a press release about it stems from the need for marketing on the university side and it's correct to be skeptical, but I can't see any indication that they misrepresent the papers findings.
- easytiger 3y agoI replied elsewhere https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36225919 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36225919 And reinterpretation of history is not remotely "science"