4 ms·
The Tesla Bricking Story? It’s Nonsense
- Anechoic 15y agoThe TC story doesn't seem to back up the headline "It's Nonsense," it just shifts the blame to the car owners.
- sek 15y agoWhy is everyone complaining about a Techcrunch headline? It's Techcrunch^^
- apress 15y agoI don't get how the story remotely supports the headline. Nothing in Tesla's long-winded statement says the bricking story is not true.
- Kaedon 15y agoIf anything, this confirms the other post. Making the parallel between standard automobiles and the Tesla makes some sense to me, as does comparing motorcycles to the Tesla. I feel like even given these comparisons, it does not seem acceptable that they can permanently brick in the way that they do. I can understand why the owners would feel upset.
- bryanlarsen 15y agoDo you think it's acceptable that Ford will not honour their warranty if you don't change the oil in your car?
- Kaedon 15y agoI think that it would have been reasonable for Ford to honor the warranty for cars in the Model T era. Fully electric vehicles have not been around long enough for it to be common knowledge that draining a battery is as serious an offensive as never changing the oil in your car. I understand the reasons that they aren't honoring the warranty. I think that Tesla could consider replacing the battery for the early adopters that got surprised by this and make it more clear to future consumers that bricking can happen.
- dmethvin 15y agoWhere's the nonsense? This doesn't seem to debunk the claim that if the batteries go totally dead you are screwed, out a $40K battery pack. > Tesla batteries can remain unplugged for weeks (or even months), without reaching zero state of charge. Maybe I'm trying to find a conspiracy here, but the batteries generally aren't unplugged; they are connected to the car and it's drawing a small current. That drain from the mostly-idle Tesla's electronics are enough to flatten the battery faster than if it was truly unplugged.
- DanBC 15y agoThat quote should be read as "tesla batteries can remain unplugged from a power source for weeks". I agree this article doesn't debunk the other article. I haven't read the Tesla documentation, but if "bricking" is real I'd expect some firm warnings about it. The other article said that those warnings were absent; it also claimed that the documents played down the risk.
- georgemcbay 15y agoI thought the story was a bit overblown when it was first posted, and still do, but I don't see how you can call out another article as "nonsense" without refuting a single factual claim it made. "The Tesla Bricking Story? It's Overblown"... okay, yeah... but "Nonsense"? Prove it.
- bstar77 15y agoIMO, this is a huge problem for the future of electric cars. If you own one, you will always have to worry about this when going away for extended periods. When I had my honda insight, just leaving it un-driven for 2 weeks would seriously deplete the battery. I never killed the battery, but after the car had 130k miles, just leaving it garaged for a few days would noticeably deplete the charge. I'm afraid that electric cars will become the new disposable car at some point because no one wants to flip the bill for a new battery pack.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- rantertoday 15y agoI used to read techcrunch pretty often.. often enough to know that this "article" is damage control then anything.
- p0ss 15y agoAnd what about Tesla remotely tracking vehicles without the owner's knowing?