4 ms·
That's an interesting observation. Painters are trained by copying the Masters. Shredding guitar players are trained on violin caprices. Martha Stewart was tra
by ksaj 3y ago
That's an interesting observation.
Painters are trained by copying the Masters. Shredding guitar players are trained on violin caprices. Martha Stewart was trained by watching Julia Child.
- wnkrshm 3y agoReal life is what good illustrators actually train from: figure studies, value studies etc. - from life. (Edit: you study like the old masters, not necessarily the paintings of them - though it is also done ofc, but not the most important part)
- wilimitis 3y agoAnd the Masters developed their style over decades pushing beyond the previously systematized constraints of their peers, something which can definitionally not be achieved by AI which works within the dimensionality of the training set and thus will always lag behind the next artistic stylistic advancements.
- candiodari 3y agoThen how come everybody thinks AI has a more or less distinct style? Incredible amounts of detail everywhere, whereas human artists tend to focus details in service of the "object" or purpose of the artwork. AI art is more like what would happen if you took Baroque art and applied it to modern styles. For a human artist the effort is not worth it.
- wilimitis 3y agoMost artists actually can tell which style each AI piece is stealing from. If you want the perfect example google "Beksinski". The overall goopy feeling of AI art is actually a turn off for most people, btw.