3 ms·
Since AI is mixing to create images and not being truly creative, I reckon it will be a worthy business to be able to detect where the pieces in an AI- generate
by emrah 3y ago
Since AI is mixing to create images and not being truly creative, I reckon it will be a worthy business to be able to detect where the pieces in an AI- generated image comes from.
- zirgs 3y agoIf a model has been trained on a diverse dataset and doesn't suffer from overfitting then that's pretty much impossible.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Auracle 3y agoWith respect, I don't think you understand how it works. They aren't making a collage.
- raincole 3y ago> where the pieces in an AI- generated image comes from. A single image "comes from" millions or even billions of pieces. It truly works like that (albeit counterintuitive). It doesn't just combine 4 or 5 images and apply a filter.
- emrah 3y agoThat's great. Then what's the fuss about copyright if the pieces from the original training data are that tiny? I saw mentions of companies being reluctant to use AI generated images because of potential copyright issues. What issues are they talking about?
- raincole 3y agoFirst of all, lawmakers and judges don't necessarily know how AI works. But even an image is made of a lot of pieces*, it's still not 100% "legal-concern-clean". Consider this hypothetical scenario: you collect one million different photos of McDonald's logo, and one million other random photos. Then you train your diffusion model and tell it to generate a logo. Of course it'd be still very similar to McDonald's logo. SD's training data is supposed to be much more diversed than that. But how could we be sure? That's where the fuss comes from. * (pieces of information, not pixels)