3 ms·
Apple doesn't even touch the GPL if it can avoid it (thus why its software is mostly based on BSD licensed code). It would even be further beyond the pale to s
by shagie 3y ago
Apple doesn't even touch the GPL if it can avoid it (thus why its software is mostly based on BSD licensed code).
It would even be further beyond the pale to say "here is a linker for 3rd party developers to use... oh, and its AGPL, sorry 'bout that."
So to the question from the GP:
> Why didn't Apple just use mold?
Because they won't tell 3rd party developers to use AGPl software or require a 3rd party developer to use a different 3rd party developer's licensed software that may change.
If Apple is going to release something, they're going to develop it and release it themselves with as few other encumbrances as possible.
- tinus_hn 3y agoThey don’t touch GPLv3 code; they avoid GPLv2 code because it can be relicensed GPLv3. That’s why they are shipping ancient bash and switching to another shell, for instance.