Yes this kind of link seems to be very misleading. It is amazing that just because an idea is presented, that it will have so many people believing it. This i

Yes this kind of link seems to be very misleading. It is amazing that just because an idea is presented, that it will have so many people believing it. This is a classic example of disinformation seeding. In reality, a casual pub chat like this is not science, not evidence not anything other than the blind leading the blind. A really great HN article would present multiple papers and deal with technology and science, as well at ethics. This discussion does not do that.