3 ms·

> I saw an interview with this guy just yesterday. He didn't see anything himself. His claim is that some people, and he believes them to be trustworthy, confid

> I saw an interview with this guy just yesterday. He didn't see anything himself. His claim is that some people, and he believes them to be trustworthy, confided in him and showed him some documents Wasn't he in charge of or in the higher end of the government led agency to investigate these things? He doesn't seem to be a nobody just saying he saw things, it was his job to investigate it for the government? And if the Inspector General is involved, along with the dudes lengthy time in front of congress, surely it's likely that evidence was presented to higher levels of government that the public still can't see legally. I get that this may be a psyop kind of thing, but writing it off as 'he didn't see anything' seems like an incorrect position to hold.

graderjs 3y ago
Grusch also brought these people in front of Congressional oversight committees to testify. There should be more info from Grusch dropping soon on NewsNation or the Need to Know podcast. They did a 7 hour interview with him, as they talk about in this behind-the-scenes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjbFZT9_EM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjbFZT9_EM
jonathanstrange 3y ago
However, one thing that every government employee knows is that they can't arrest you for fictional stories. In contrast, if you're saying the truth, then you're facing decades in prison. So what are you going to do if you need to make some money with books and talks, etc. Tell the truth or lie?
- StanislavPetrov 3y ago
  >However, one thing that every government employee knows is that they can't arrest you for fictional stories. They certainly can arrest you for fictional stories told under oath and in sworn statements (which is what this whistleblower gave).
denton-scratch 3y ago
> but writing it off as 'he didn't see anything' seems like an incorrect position to hold. Why incorrect? He specifically says he didn't see anything.

graderjs 3y ago

Grusch also brought these people in front of Congressional oversight committees to testify. There should be more info from Grusch dropping soon on NewsNation or the Need to Know podcast. They did a 7 hour interview with him, as they talk about in this behind-the-scenes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjbFZT9_EM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjbFZT9_EM

jonathanstrange 3y ago

However, one thing that every government employee knows is that they can't arrest you for fictional stories. In contrast, if you're saying the truth, then you're facing decades in prison. So what are you going to do if you need to make some money with books and talks, etc. Tell the truth or lie?

StanislavPetrov 3y ago
>However, one thing that every government employee knows is that they can't arrest you for fictional stories. They certainly can arrest you for fictional stories told under oath and in sworn statements (which is what this whistleblower gave).

denton-scratch 3y ago

> but writing it off as 'he didn't see anything' seems like an incorrect position to hold. Why incorrect? He specifically says he didn't see anything.