4 ms·
This begs the question: what is Apple’s real play with Apple Vision? It sounds like there’s a real possibility that, even at a $3500 price point for hardware, t
by lumb63 3y ago
This begs the question: what is Apple’s real play with Apple Vision? It sounds like there’s a real possibility that, even at a $3500 price point for hardware, the consumer is still the product. What else can their system determine about someone’s brain? What is going to be done with that data?
- ShamelessC 3y agoHopefully it at least means I can type out the “eyes rolling” emoji by simply rolling my eyes.
- KaiserPro 3y agoThe eye tracking required to get that level of accuracy is really high. Normally you need a bunch of camera like sensors that operate different to rolling/global shutter, plus a hefty calibration routine to get a good map of the eyeball. Even then it only really works looking dead ahead with your eye wide open. so for the moment, that stuff is firmly in the lab. So whats the real play? to replace phones with glasses that know you better than you know your self. To bake all that you see and do into <300 megs a day, and make it searchable in a way thats useful to you (not as in where was I at 22:04 on the 4th) as in "when did I last see x, what colour y did they say they liked?" but without having to ask that question. Imagine a really really good personal assistant, that could answer 99.5% of the boring questions asked you with authority. That is the level of AI they (and google and facebook) want
- astrange 3y agoNobody wants to do anything with anyone's data. The idea that your data is valuable is largely an excuse to feel self important. Facebook, for instance, makes money by showing you ads, not with "your data".